Below, is an interview with an ex-Navy Seal, who, during the years
1992-2000 was sent on top secret bombing missions in the Middle East,
predominantly in Iraq. Years after the first Gulf War when we were
supposedly not at war with Iraq yet he and Seal Team 9 were targeting
Tomahawk Missiles on a monthly basis taking out targets that were
increasingly "soft"... involving deaths of hundreds of innocent
civilians. Find out how this highly trained young man and his team were
coerced by the military into purposely destroying villages and creating
future terrorists as part of a plan that would ultimately serve their
dark purpose, the war on terror and 911. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkIIBnIuXHM
His story is similar to a report that the U.S. military first kills people with drones, then fires on the rescuers and others who arrive at the scene where the new corpses and injured victims lie. http://www.salon.com/2012/02/05/u_s_drones_targeting_rescuers_and_mourners/singleton/ This isn't war, this is creating terror and slaughtering innocents. Those who are giving such orders are committing war crimes against humanity. They are psychopaths.
The next footage reveals a newsman on CNN camera is implying something else hit the Pentagon, something other than a large passenger airliner. A smaller aircraft, a guided missile perhaps, or possibly a military aircraft with a missile attached? He doesn't say.
American Military and Intelligence Officers question the White House version of events regarding 9/11 http://patriotsquestion911.com/ Are North Americans aware of the rising number of US Military and Government Officers who do not support the White House conspiracy theory that a handful of poorly trained pilots pulled off the 9/11 WTC demolition. Much more was involved.
The reason this 9/11 trade tower demolition is worthy of our full attention is that two illegal wars (based on known falsified evidence of non-existent weapons of destruction) were allowed to ensue....killing hundreds of thousands of innocents....This 9/11 event was pivotal in fabricating the war-on-terrorism....or some would say, 'The never-ending war of terror". The White House told us we were engaged in overtaking the ''axis-of-evil'', but others would say we are militarily overtaking the "axis-of-oil-bearing nations".
Below are just a handful of the Government/military whistle-blowers: General Wesley Clark, Colonel Ronald D. Ray, Captain Edgar Mitchell DSc, Dr. Robert M. Bowman Head of Advanced Space Programs for DOD and retired Lt. Col for United States Air Force http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlGm9ZorT4Q (video interview with Col. R. Bowman) Colonel George Nelson MBA, Colonel Ann Wright, Col. Donn De Grand-Pre, Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford, Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, Former Deputy Assistant to Secretary of State, Dr. Steve Pieczenik, Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, Commander Ted Muga, Commander Ralph Kolstad, Commander James Clow, MS, Lt. Col. Paul F. Getty, DDS, Former US Marines fighter pilot Joel M. Skousen, Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, Retired fighter pilot Maj. Brian Power-Waters, Maj. Charles E. Dills, PhD, Capt. Russ Wittenberg former US fighter pilot and commercial pilot, Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director
Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading on 9/11 Flights, Lead Directly into the CIA's Highest Ranks Investigation by Michael C. Ruppert - former Los Angeles Police Department narcotics investigator who discovered CIA trafficking in drugs in 1977. After attempting to expose this, he was forced out of LAPD in 1978 while earning the highest rating reports possible and having no pending disciplinary actions. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/illegaltades.html Quote: "One wonders how much damning evidence is necessary to respond to what is now irrefutable proof that CIA knew about the attacks and did not stop them. Whatever our government is doing, whatever the CIA is doing, it is clearly NOT in the interests of the American people, especially those who died on September 11." Quote: " Her answered floored me. She said, "It probably would have been easy for us to find out who was behind the trades, but the government came in and told the CBOE (Chicago Board Options Exchange) president to stop the investigation." "I said to her again, a third time, making sure I heard right, "The government didn't want you to investigate?" She looked at me said "Yes, that's right." Then she looked at me a little longer, she knew I had interest in this topic, she looked a little nervous and then blurted out to me, "We erased the data. Our data on the trades is gone."
Vice-President Dick Cheney Admitted no evidence linked Osama Bin Laden to 9/11 Even Vice-President Dick Cheney admitted in an interview that no evidence linked Osama Bin Laden to the 9/11 World Trade Center destruction. Yet, as anyone can see, the Bin Laden 'done it' myth was propagated for years (despite Bin Laden's documented death in December of 2001) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nX-KQbYXnk
Both hijacking by CIA assets, and a controlled demolition were used in the 9/11 WTC operation: CIA Asset Susan Lindauer - 'Plausable Deniability' Please note: Let is be known that the US Administration have pulled the strings to discredit and marginalize Ms. Lindauer. The criminals will not have their crimes exposed. Lindauer was jailed early on for 'allegedly' being mentally unstable. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxJTwbHdH6k&feature=related
She also spoke about the Lockerbie plane bombing: "To sum up, Lockerbie was a false flag operation to hide rogue CIA involvement in heroin trafficking out of the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon, during the Terry Anderson hostage crisis. A joint team of CIA, FBI and Defense Intelligence investigators were flying on Pan Am 103 that day, heading for Washington to expose the heroin ring, when the plane exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland. Libya got tagged as the fall guy, but like 9/11, the truth refused to die." http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/23/the-ugly-truth-video-of-libyan-rebel-beheading-gadhaffi-soldier-cannibalism-rape-and-other-nato-war-crimes/ Her history of depositions and other important reviews: http://911review.org/Lindauer/ Since that time, the US Administration have pulled the strings to discredit and marginalize Ms. Lindauer. The criminals will not have their crimes exposed.
Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 Fraud to Aaron Russo: Eleven months before the 9/11 WTC demolition, US insiders had prior knowledge of the false flag event which was to be used to justify a war-on-terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. The war on terror was based on an orchestrated event, namely the World Trade Center 'demolition', on September 11, 2001. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA
Congressman Ron Paul states that there was no justification for American military intervention in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq or Libya. He states that the hijackers of 9/11 were a group of people not a group of nations. America needed to go after those responsible, not attack entire, non-affiliated, Middle Eastern nations who in no way threatened or provoked war. He implied that 9/11 was used as an excuse to war on the axis-of-oil-bearing nations. Go to the 3:34 mark in the following video interview. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RLonnC_ZWQ0#!
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD Pentagon employee and eyewitness to the events at the Pentagon on 9/11: "I believe the Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research. ...
It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...
There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...
I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.
The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.
The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon
Colonel Donn De Grand-Pre Article September 11 - U.S. Government Accused by the Portugal News 3/8/02: "A group of military and civilian US pilots, under the chairmanship of Colonel Donn de Grand [sic], after deliberating non-stop for 72 hours, has concluded that the flight crews of the four passenger airliners, involved in the September 11th tragedy, had no control over their aircraft."
In a detailed press communiqué the inquiry stated: "The so-called terrorist attack was in fact a superbly executed military operation carried out against the USA, requiring the utmost professional military skill in command, communications and control. It was flawless in timing, in the choice of selected aircraft to be used as guided missiles and in the coordinated delivery of those missiles to their pre-selected targets."
The report seriously questions whether or not the suspect hijackers, supposedly trained on Cessna light aircraft, could have located a target dead-on 200 miles from take off point. It further throws into doubt their ability to master the intricacies of the instrument flight rules (IFR) in the 45 minutes from take off to the point of impact. Colonel de Grand said that it would be impossible for novices to have taken control of the four aircraft and orchestrated such a terrible act requiring military precision of the highest order." http://www.amfirstbooks.com
Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS Statement to this website 3/25/07: http://patriotsquestion911.com/ "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.
The "collapse" of WTC Building 7 shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein's video taped confession in which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse."
[Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]
We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.
Former
Deputy Assistant to Secretary of State, Dr. Steve Pieczenik, declares Bin
Laden was known to have died in December 2001...and that the World Trade
Center, 9/11 demolition, was an orchestrated, false flag event. go to minute 6:46 on the video clip for Pieczenik interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xj0pM5FoYbs&feature=player_embedded#at=14
Confessions of an Economic Hit-Man In the link "Confessions of an Economic Hit‐Man" John Perkins describes the insidious activities of World Bank/IMF economic hit‐men along with the assassinations and coup d' etat performed by US undercover 'Jackals'. A two minute cartoon explanation narrated by John Perkins: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7Fzm1hEiDQ Go to the video box and click it to play. http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=83B1AF93091799E7CEB88C5C459A530B
US Secretary Mineta statements lead us to believe that Flight 93 was shot down before hitting the White House. Why wasn't Flight 77 shot down before it hit the Pentagon? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJAI4-e7Xw Flight 93 and Flight 77 Timelines http://www.fromthewilderness.com/timeline/AAflight93.html (9:55 AM)According to US Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, one particular air threat approached the 50 mile out, then 30 mile out, and final 10 mile protected airspace perimeter position. Vice President Cheney was in the White House bunker with Mineta and was warned of the incoming air threat. Because of that verbal interaction, we can only conclude that the approaching Flight 93 aircraft was shot down later between 10:03 and 10:06 AM, and that the orders from Vice President Dick Cheney must have been shoot down orders. On the other hand, If this verbal interaction allegedly occurred before Flight 77 had hit the Pentagon at 9:41 AM. E', why wasn't that air-threat shot down as it approached the Pentagon? Could those orders have been 'stand down' regarding the Pentagon.(Flight 77)....while 22 minutes later, have been shoot down orders regarding (Flight 93) over Shanksville?
Go to (After 9:44 A.M.) "According to F-16 pilot Honey's account, at some point after the F-16's had set up a defensive perimeter over Washington, the lead pilot received a garbled message about Flight 93 that wasn't heard by the other two pilots. "The message seemed to convey that the White House was an important assent to protect." (9:55 A.M.) This would explain why as Flight 93 was approaching the defensive perimeter surrounding Washington, when the officer came to Cheney and asked ''Do the orders still stand?" according to Mineta, Cheney replied "Well of course they still stand." Those must have been 'shoot down' orders. Because, later on, Flight 93 was shot down near Shanksville at 10:03 to 10:06 AM. On the other hand, If those orders were in regard to Flight 77 as it allegedly approached the Pentagon, then why was that air threat not shot down? In regards to an approaching air threat to the Pentagon, could those orders have been 'stand down'? Go to (Before 10:06 A.M.) Ernie Stuhl, the mayor of Shanksville: "I know of two people -- I will not mention names -- that heard a missile. They both live very close, within a couple of hundred yards... This one fellow's served in Vietnam and he says he's heard them, and he heard one that day." He adds that based on what he has learned, F-16's were "very, very close." [Philadelphia Daily News, 11/15/01]
So the question arises, why were air-force fighter jets not scrambled for a full 31 minutes after FAA lost transponder contact with Flight 77? (8:56 A.M.)Ê Flight 77's transponder signal is turned off. Why wasn't Flight 77 shot down? Why was it allowed to hit the Pentagon at (9:41 AM) E'? Because according to the interview with Norman Mineta, this air craft threat was being monitored as it approached the Pentagon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJAI4-e7Xw
Concluding remarks: http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a910tobunker#a910tobunker On the timeline, I have discovered that many reports state that Cheney didn't get into the White House Bunker with Mineta until after 9:55 AM ...which is well after the Flight 77 had hit the Pentagon at 9:41 AM. So, if that is the case, then Cheney could not have been referring to the alleged Flight 77 as it approached the Pentagon, when Mineta heard him say 'of course the orders still stand'.
Instead, those alleged 'shoot down' orders will have applied to the flight 93 approaching the White House airspace perimeter zone that had been established according to air pilot, code-named, 'Honey'. Which could support the testimony of the mayor of Shanksville that jet fighters were seen in the area. and that missile fire had been heard...as the flight 93 crashed between 10:03 and 10:06 AM. All this occurring while Cheney was in the White House Bunker giving orders.
Secondly, why was Cheney giving orders?
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a910tobunker#a910tobunker Thirdly, if Cheney was in the White House Bunker with Mineta, as early as 9:26 AM, and the approaching flight 77 air threat was being monitored by radar, then why was that air threat not shot down? If those orders were 'shoot down' orders, then why was that air threat allowed to hit the Pentagon?
Lastly, If NORAD was involved in some kind of cover-up, then can we trust their timeline version of events? Why was NORAD command over-ridden by Rumsfeld? Why the promotions of NORAD top command after the destructive events of 9/11 and NORAD's poor response?
General Ralph Eberhart, NORAD commander during 9/11/01. Eberhart was later promoted to direct NORTHCOM.
General Myers, Acting Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on 9/11/01. Myers was promoted to Chairman days after the attack."
Shanksville 'alleged' crashsite of Flight 93 Was this flight, in actuality, 'shot down' by US air-force fighter jets?
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words... Crashsite Flight 93, Shanksville/ Pennsylvania http://twitpic.com/g4hb4 However, if the aircraft were blown out of the sky, then that would explain the scattered debris found miles away, and why little debris and bodies were found at the crash-site.
There is a hole-- but not much plane debris (bodies, seats or plane parts) in the immediate area , as is found in a usual passenger airplane crash site. So, we are left to understand that the plane must have been blown out of the sky by air-force missile fire, or by a bomb inside the plane. No problem with that. Evidence Indicates Flight 93 Was Shot Down http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/flight93/index.html Flight 93 Timeline http://www.fromthewilderness.com/timeline/AAflight93.html The question that arises is: "If it was shot down, why weren't the other planes shot down by air-force missile fire before arriving at the trade towers or the Pentagon?"
Donald Rumsfeld exposed: 'The origin of the 'Stand-Down' orders' http://911review.com/means/standdown.html "CJCSI 3610.01, dated July 31, 1997, required that all requests for assistance in hijackings be approved by the Secretary of Defense. An update to that order, CJCSI 3610.01, dated June 1, 2001, had an exception for emergencies that would seem to give commanders in the field autonomy in ordering intercepts. However, that exception did not cover requests for "potentially lethal assistance", the kind required to respond to the attack:" "(DODD 2025.15, Feb. 18, 1997) 4.4 The Secretary of Defense retains approval authority for support to civil authorities involving: use of Commander in Chief (CINC)-assigned forces (personnel units, and equipment) when required under paragraph 4.5, below; DoD support that will result in a planned event with the potential for confrontation with specifically identified individuals and/or groups or will result in the use of lethal force. 1 "
Why a flying command post is present....and yet no interceptors?
Video footage of: "The 'mystery plane' seen on takeoff on apparently 'live' footage on 9/11. The aircraft is the E-4B Doomsday Plane....a military aircraft...a flying command post. It was seen near WTC 2 just prior to, and during, the impact of "Flight 175" It was seen near the Pentagon. It was seen over the White House." Why was this command post flying about, and yet jet fighter aircraft were allegedly not scrambled on time to intercept the hijacked aircraft? from this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ89yrnCO-4&feature=related and this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMK5bmdAEHc&NR=1
