Digital Imaging Used in TV Broadcasts of 9/11 Trade Tower Events
http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/digital-imaging-used-in-tv-broadcasts-of-911-trade-tower-events.html
Please take the time to watch, listen and think about these investigations which expose major TV Broadcasting agencies caught in the act of using digital imaging, graphically overlaid images, and sound dubbing on their televised broadcasts of the 9/11 trade tower controlled demolition.
Analysis of the plume of smoke...not the plane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkzfKRe0gbc&feature=fvwrel
http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/digital-imaging-used-in-tv-broadcasts-of-911-trade-tower-events.html
Please take the time to watch, listen and think about these investigations which expose major TV Broadcasting agencies caught in the act of using digital imaging, graphically overlaid images, and sound dubbing on their televised broadcasts of the 9/11 trade tower controlled demolition.
Analysis of the plume of smoke...not the plane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkzfKRe0gbc&feature=fvwrel
Some analysis
There are three models of 767. The 200, the 300, and the 400 model of 767....and each one varies in length. 767 military aircraft have been developed which can be 'remotely controlled'. So these aircraft are not necessarily Flight 11 or Flight 175. It could well have been a military aircraft.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc_demolition_init.htm
Next is an analysis of identical footage taken from the same angle/same spot and re-edited by alleged "different" cameramen. Now, what is that all about???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_8LV0VtgQ
Thanks to Simon Shack on Youtube for these amazing revelations.
This helicopter video clip shows us that no plane hit the second tower, yet there was an explosion.
Other news agencies showing the same camera angle footage, must have 'inserted' the image of an approaching plane. Why were the images of a plane digitally inserted?
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1877/785/New_9_11_Footage:_There_Is_No_Plane_-_Filmed_From_Helicopter.html
Did the alleged aircraft even arrive at the towers?
9/11 Airplane Affidavit by John Lear, son of Learjet inventor
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1935/777/9_11_Airplane_Affidavit_By_John_Lear,_Son_Of_Learjet_Inventor.html?currentSplittedPage=6
And who would be able to control those aircraft? (if there were any used)
And who could switch off transponders at the exact time these aircraft entered 'radar gaps'?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#at=390
Radar Physics Group develops Flight Termination System defense technology.
http://911review.org/brad.com/batcave/Dov_Zakheim_911.html
This investigator says that the plane that hit the second (South)Tower was not Flight 175. By his estimates a model 300 of the Boeing 767 was used. However, even if it were a 767 - 200, a remodeled military 767 - 200 could have been used.
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
Which would explain the 'fishy' flight data
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html
And would explain the fact that at least 7 of the 'alleged' hijackers are still alive
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
And would explain why expert pilots discuss their doubts with regards to any inexperienced pilots being able to maneuver passenger airplanes into the World Trade Center towers at speeds over 500 mph at those low altitudes. In other words, were those planes actually 'passenger' airliners or were they 'remote-controlled' aircraft?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16TExO2afr8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78&NR=1
Different Videos reveal Different Aircraft Speeds. Why?
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/speed/
More Analysis of TV Fakery Broadcast that tragic day
Some very interesting analysis of home shots versus television station footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM&feature=related
Simulated Victims: Why fake victims?? Why are we being hoodwinked?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfcPwgi99oU&feature=related
More analysis of smoke plume in relation to the aircraft image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVXJCOFT_rA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKeqdV7dON8&NR=1&feature=endscreen
Nose in - Nose out, followed by a deliberate CNN cover-up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXda5Kn2LAM&feature=related
More analysis of sounds dubbed into released trade tower explosion tapes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfacCQj_mlI&feature=related
BBC broadcast reporting is very. very 'fishy'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc0E6wTgb5Q&feature=related
This investigator discovers that a Jennifer Spell video has used 'spellbinding fakery':
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/spell/
"Nose Dive" footage steeped in contradiction
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/nosedive/
Another Youtube video showing actual broadcast videos which were 'doctored' with digital imaging:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vIR0uaDSuA&feature=related
again begging the question "Why were we shown graphically altered videos in the first place?"
This is where the movie "Wag The Dog" becomes important.
The movie reveals how easily doctored images of 'passenger aircraft' were digitally inserted into 9/11 WTC Television footage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-FXkj-r9Mc
These video clips explain why so many air force pilots have their own doubts as to the ''official White House, and televised, version of 9/11 events". It also explains how doctored, and studio produced, 'Bin Laden' video tapes were often fed to the unwary public.
We learn from the movie 'Wag The Dog' just how digital imaging is done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k-rr70xj2o&feature=related
There are three models of 767. The 200, the 300, and the 400 model of 767....and each one varies in length. 767 military aircraft have been developed which can be 'remotely controlled'. So these aircraft are not necessarily Flight 11 or Flight 175. It could well have been a military aircraft.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/wtc_demolition_init.htm
Next is an analysis of identical footage taken from the same angle/same spot and re-edited by alleged "different" cameramen. Now, what is that all about???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_8LV0VtgQ
Thanks to Simon Shack on Youtube for these amazing revelations.
This helicopter video clip shows us that no plane hit the second tower, yet there was an explosion.
Other news agencies showing the same camera angle footage, must have 'inserted' the image of an approaching plane. Why were the images of a plane digitally inserted?
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1877/785/New_9_11_Footage:_There_Is_No_Plane_-_Filmed_From_Helicopter.html
Did the alleged aircraft even arrive at the towers?
9/11 Airplane Affidavit by John Lear, son of Learjet inventor
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1935/777/9_11_Airplane_Affidavit_By_John_Lear,_Son_Of_Learjet_Inventor.html?currentSplittedPage=6
And who would be able to control those aircraft? (if there were any used)
And who could switch off transponders at the exact time these aircraft entered 'radar gaps'?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#at=390
Radar Physics Group develops Flight Termination System defense technology.
http://911review.org/brad.com/batcave/Dov_Zakheim_911.html
This investigator says that the plane that hit the second (South)Tower was not Flight 175. By his estimates a model 300 of the Boeing 767 was used. However, even if it were a 767 - 200, a remodeled military 767 - 200 could have been used.
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
Which would explain the 'fishy' flight data
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html
And would explain the fact that at least 7 of the 'alleged' hijackers are still alive
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
And would explain why expert pilots discuss their doubts with regards to any inexperienced pilots being able to maneuver passenger airplanes into the World Trade Center towers at speeds over 500 mph at those low altitudes. In other words, were those planes actually 'passenger' airliners or were they 'remote-controlled' aircraft?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16TExO2afr8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78&NR=1
Different Videos reveal Different Aircraft Speeds. Why?
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/speed/
More Analysis of TV Fakery Broadcast that tragic day
Some very interesting analysis of home shots versus television station footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM&feature=related
Simulated Victims: Why fake victims?? Why are we being hoodwinked?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfcPwgi99oU&feature=related
More analysis of smoke plume in relation to the aircraft image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVXJCOFT_rA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKeqdV7dON8&NR=1&feature=endscreen
Nose in - Nose out, followed by a deliberate CNN cover-up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXda5Kn2LAM&feature=related
More analysis of sounds dubbed into released trade tower explosion tapes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfacCQj_mlI&feature=related
BBC broadcast reporting is very. very 'fishy'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc0E6wTgb5Q&feature=related
This investigator discovers that a Jennifer Spell video has used 'spellbinding fakery':
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/spell/
"Nose Dive" footage steeped in contradiction
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/nosedive/
Another Youtube video showing actual broadcast videos which were 'doctored' with digital imaging:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vIR0uaDSuA&feature=related
again begging the question "Why were we shown graphically altered videos in the first place?"
This is where the movie "Wag The Dog" becomes important.
The movie reveals how easily doctored images of 'passenger aircraft' were digitally inserted into 9/11 WTC Television footage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-FXkj-r9Mc
These video clips explain why so many air force pilots have their own doubts as to the ''official White House, and televised, version of 9/11 events". It also explains how doctored, and studio produced, 'Bin Laden' video tapes were often fed to the unwary public.
We learn from the movie 'Wag The Dog' just how digital imaging is done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k-rr70xj2o&feature=related
In the next video, move the arrow inside the small white circle to the 4:20 seconds mark of the video. Then watch as the investigator reveals the 'digital imaging' used in syndicated broadcasts of the 9/11 trade tower demolition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXda5Kn2LAM&feature=related
Was it digital imaging? It may well have been. Eye-witnesses reported that a missile, a military plane, or an aircraft with no windows were the cause of these explosions in the South Towers.
http://www.911foreknowledge.com/debris/itsabomb.htm
Was it digital imaging? It may well have been. Eye-witnesses reported that a missile, a military plane, or an aircraft with no windows were the cause of these explosions in the South Towers.
http://www.911foreknowledge.com/debris/itsabomb.htm
Or was it some kind of missile or drone missile, where identification was hidden by news agency trickery?
Some analysis of what may have caused those explosions in the twin towers. Helicopter video footage reveals no airplane prior to explosions in second tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxVP9lPztgQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxVP9lPztgQ
Keeping in mind that the helicopter shot shows no airplane approach, in the next video we see how images were added into the televised footage of trade tower events.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awF4pPxtcdQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awF4pPxtcdQ
Concluding questions:
This helicopter video clip shows us that no plane hit the second tower, yet there was an explosion.
Other news agencies showing the same camera angle footage, must have 'inserted' the image of an approaching plane. Why were the images of a plane inserted?
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1877/785/New_9_11_Footage:_There_Is_No_Plane_-_Filmed_From_Helicopter.html
Which would again explain 'Aircraft in -- Missile Out'
http://webfairy.org/missileout/index.htm
This investigator says that the plane that hit the Second Tower was not Flight 175
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
It may throw clues towards who controlled the planes, missles, or explosives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#at=390
http://911review.org/brad.com/batcave/Dov_Zakheim_911.html
And would explain the 'fishy' flight data
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html
And would explain the fact that at least 7 of the 'alleged' hijackers are still alive
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
And would explain why many of the hijackers' names do not appear on flight list manifests:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6gtqAr241I&feature=related
Where are the 9/11 victims in the Social Security Death Index?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjlkF9DlImI&feature=related
This helicopter video clip shows us that no plane hit the second tower, yet there was an explosion.
Other news agencies showing the same camera angle footage, must have 'inserted' the image of an approaching plane. Why were the images of a plane inserted?
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1877/785/New_9_11_Footage:_There_Is_No_Plane_-_Filmed_From_Helicopter.html
Which would again explain 'Aircraft in -- Missile Out'
http://webfairy.org/missileout/index.htm
This investigator says that the plane that hit the Second Tower was not Flight 175
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
It may throw clues towards who controlled the planes, missles, or explosives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#at=390
http://911review.org/brad.com/batcave/Dov_Zakheim_911.html
And would explain the 'fishy' flight data
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html
And would explain the fact that at least 7 of the 'alleged' hijackers are still alive
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
And would explain why many of the hijackers' names do not appear on flight list manifests:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6gtqAr241I&feature=related
Where are the 9/11 victims in the Social Security Death Index?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjlkF9DlImI&feature=related
Witnesses Question What Hit The Towers
Eyewitnesses were not sure that it was 'passenger' airplanes that hit the trade towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT1z90BB8E4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2QAh0rBrew&feature=related
Eyewitnesses report seeing a 'military plane' with 'no windows' hit the towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY&feature=related
In the next interview with 9/11 firemen, at the 2:33 minute mark, the firefighter states that he saw a 'black, very large airplane fly into the second building'. He didn't see a 'passenger plane'....he saw what was reported by others as a 'military plane'....or by others as a 'plane with no windows'. Besides their testimony of bombs and explosions going off, indicating it was a controlled demolition, the report of a 'black' airplane hitting the second tower is important to take notice of.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmC_HKRu428&feature=related
Trade Towers: "No second plane....it was a bomb".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0eC3uns3pA&feature=related
Eyewitnesses report one tower was hit by a 'military plane' with no windows inside:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdB5iMydROM
Some photos of military aircraft without windows...and some statements by eye-witnesses:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&NR=1&feature=endscreen
In depth analysis of the second 'plane':
More video analysis about missile and second plane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8mWx_JfyoM&feature=related
more in depth analysis of the underside of the aircraft that hits the second tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVoU0f9gtlE&feature=endscreen&NR=1
http://911review.com/spencer/markup/spencer06.html
Air Traffic Controller said the activity of the aircraft reminded him of a military aircraft:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vPpZOxSyCs&feature=related
Proof bombs were detonated from inside the towers just like in a "controlled demolition"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvyBY8d554I
Could it have been a grey aircraft with no windows, as was seen by some?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related
This eye-witness claims he heard the sound of a missile approaching the second tower. Even the chopper 4 televised images don't show us any 'large' aircraft approaching that tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq8eiNxKFXI
Military Plane or Refitted 767?
Who controlled the planes?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#at=390
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#!
Could military 767 planes have been painted and used on 9/11? Many eye-witness reports do not identify a passenger aircraft (ie: Flight 11 or Flight 175)
Here is an example of how a cruise missile can be painted up to look like a small version of a passenger aircraft.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxdDQL79pl8 Go to the 1:15 mark in this clip.
Pilots for 9/11 truth: This next presentation uses thorough, air-flight physics in the explanation of how passenger planes just could not have been flown into the trade towers by inexperienced, or experienced, pilots. Possibly, refitted, remote guided aircraft could have, but that begs the question: Where were these aircraft refitted and who controlled them? Once again the questions arise: Were 'passenger' aircraft used at all? Were missiles or military aircraft used? Could digital imaging have been used on the television productions to 'stage' an event, an event which was, in actuality, just a 'controlled demolition'?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdjgtBj_HwM&feature=related
Air Flight Discrepancies
So what happened to the passengers and planes and - alleged phone calls:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W-gAg90AQU&feature=related ('alleged' hijackers are alive and well)
Digitalized photos of ''alleged'' victims:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3yTRKhlyqU&feature=related
Simulated Victims - VicSims
Why would the media use 'doctored' images of 'alleged' 9/11 victims?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoZEuj1VPv0&feature=related
Simulated Victims:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfcPwgi99oU&feature=related
Where are the 9/11 victims in the Social Security Death Index?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjlkF9DlImI&feature=related
More 'fishy' flight data?
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html
On next web page, scroll down to read conversations:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/264627/1/
In this link is found the RITA records of BTS statistics of past American air-flights which show no record of AA Flight 11 departing Boston Logan, or AA Flight 77 departing from Washington Dulles on September 11, 2001: You will need to insert the necessary Flight number, departure zone, and departure date and time ...for each of those two flights.
http://www.bts.gov/xml/ontimesummarystatistics/src/dstat/OntimeSummaryDepatures.xml
Flight Data Expert Confirmation: No Evidence Linking FDR Data to American 77
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=20999
Begging more questions.
Why were there discrepancies in the passenger lists, and why were 'reported' passengers found to be 'fictitious'?
Investigators discover passengers and witnesses were fictitious?
http://www.letsroll911.org/
Why would CNN put up a memorial to a fictitious passenger?
http://www.letsroll911.org/2011/09/09/mark-bingham-lets-roll-hero-flight-93fraud-digital-data-exif/
(Passengers were discovered to be fictitious: see 2minutes:20seconds into the video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrsvmM40lio
(More detail on fictitious passengers: using the Social Security Death Index)
http://forums.eog.com/f23/great-blog-on-9-11-lies-207486/
At least 7 of the 'alleged' hijackers are still alive
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
All these subjects are just begging more questions... All these areas leave us with so few answers.
Both hijacking by CIA assets, and a controlled demolition were used in the 9/11 WTC operation:
CIA Asset Susan Lindauer - 'Plausable Deniability'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxJTwbHdH6k&feature=related
Shanksville site
"No bodies"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5JC45KMGo&feature=related
Ariel View of "alleged'' crash site:
http://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2010/01/01/9-11-shanksville-flight-93/
Compare the Lockerbie Aircraft bombing site to the Shanksville site:
http://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/08/26/lockerbie-bombing-evidence/
Further Research Links:
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 911 TRUTH WEBSITE
http://www.ae911truth.org/
JOURNAL OF 911 STUDIES WEBSITE
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
AE911Truth - Richard Humenn P.E.E. WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMKReas0WNc
AE911Truth Michael Donly, P.E., Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOL71aZugL4
AE911Truth Kamal Obeid, C.E., S.E. Civil and Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EuFqsyETKQ
AE911Truth Jerry Lobdall, C.E. Chemical Engineer Physicist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0iVvwxjtrA
AE911Truth Casey Pfeiffer, S.E. Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWv_wVKA_7M
AE911Truth Robert Podolski, Physicist, Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP0ykcvOuno
AE911Truth Lynn Margulis, PhD, Scientist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y56Z1zkmAPQ
AE911TRUTH Stephen Dusterwald S.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VJy_-eL4C8
AE911Truth Tony Szamboti, M.E. - Mechanical Engineer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uyIS57GpO0
AE911Truth Stephen Barasch High-rise Architect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M44Kyg3HVHI
AE911Truth - Scott Grainger,FPE - Fire Protection Engineer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHHJIg0vVyQ
AE911Truth - Les Young - High-rise Architect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfoVpDPNXRE
AE911Truth Robert McCoy High-rise Architect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcyFd63Ef_0
AE911Truth Kathy McGrade, B.S. Metallurgical Engineering.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zNHLg3j7sM
AE911Truth Ron Brookman, S E Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2T7yrq5SIw
AE911Truth David Topete, MSCE, S.E..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv1MvCmqimg
WTC Eyewitness " a bomb went off in the lobby first,then a plane hit"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCc9PuQA9b4&feature=watch_response
9/11 WTC Eyewitness heard explosion before WTC2 collapsed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSIT8zKVDmg
9/11 Eyewitness- "Flames exploded out the front of the World Trade Center"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VoFVl9RSpk&feature=related
911 Eyewitness Nina Pineda - "ground shook/booming sound".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b59rAkvjMfY
911 Eyewitness ABC7 Nina Pineda - "Firebombs And Explosions."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9zGcpyoDmg
9/11 Eyewitness Nina Pineda -"From that last explosion it is now again dark"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNym5VZ98KE
9/11 WTC Eyewitness - Philip Morelli
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyeDF37jUI
911 WTC EYEWITNESSES BASEMENT AND LOBBY EXPLOSIONS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAJa8eu-6_g
9/11 Eyewitness to molten metal David Long.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2VWhSVySeg
9/11 WTC Eyewitness Marlene Cruz describes basement explosions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z51vqH6VZL4
9/11 WTC Eyewitness Joe Torres. WABC-NY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv-6eVrPd2w
9/11 : WTC Eyewitness heard "large boom" before the collapse of WTC2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo6WH8o6qmU
9/11 WTC - NYPD Cop "numerous secondary explosions" in WTC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWq0HEBInLE
9/11 WTC CNN:"When The First Tower Collapsed It Was A Massive Explosion"Patty Sabga
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAcxfSExyJk
WTC Eyewitness " a bomb went off in the lobby first,then a plane hit"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCc9PuQA9b4
9/11 : FireFighters describe 3 Explosions After Plane Hit WTC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Tb8gSGQ10
9/11 :WTC Eyewitness describes explosions ( see video description) NIST F.O.I.A.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArNQF-cONhA
Eyewitnesses were not sure that it was 'passenger' airplanes that hit the trade towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT1z90BB8E4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2QAh0rBrew&feature=related
Eyewitnesses report seeing a 'military plane' with 'no windows' hit the towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY&feature=related
In the next interview with 9/11 firemen, at the 2:33 minute mark, the firefighter states that he saw a 'black, very large airplane fly into the second building'. He didn't see a 'passenger plane'....he saw what was reported by others as a 'military plane'....or by others as a 'plane with no windows'. Besides their testimony of bombs and explosions going off, indicating it was a controlled demolition, the report of a 'black' airplane hitting the second tower is important to take notice of.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmC_HKRu428&feature=related
Trade Towers: "No second plane....it was a bomb".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0eC3uns3pA&feature=related
Eyewitnesses report one tower was hit by a 'military plane' with no windows inside:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdB5iMydROM
Some photos of military aircraft without windows...and some statements by eye-witnesses:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&NR=1&feature=endscreen
In depth analysis of the second 'plane':
More video analysis about missile and second plane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8mWx_JfyoM&feature=related
more in depth analysis of the underside of the aircraft that hits the second tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVoU0f9gtlE&feature=endscreen&NR=1
http://911review.com/spencer/markup/spencer06.html
Air Traffic Controller said the activity of the aircraft reminded him of a military aircraft:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vPpZOxSyCs&feature=related
Proof bombs were detonated from inside the towers just like in a "controlled demolition"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvyBY8d554I
Could it have been a grey aircraft with no windows, as was seen by some?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related
This eye-witness claims he heard the sound of a missile approaching the second tower. Even the chopper 4 televised images don't show us any 'large' aircraft approaching that tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq8eiNxKFXI
Military Plane or Refitted 767?
Who controlled the planes?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#at=390
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#!
Could military 767 planes have been painted and used on 9/11? Many eye-witness reports do not identify a passenger aircraft (ie: Flight 11 or Flight 175)
Here is an example of how a cruise missile can be painted up to look like a small version of a passenger aircraft.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxdDQL79pl8 Go to the 1:15 mark in this clip.
Pilots for 9/11 truth: This next presentation uses thorough, air-flight physics in the explanation of how passenger planes just could not have been flown into the trade towers by inexperienced, or experienced, pilots. Possibly, refitted, remote guided aircraft could have, but that begs the question: Where were these aircraft refitted and who controlled them? Once again the questions arise: Were 'passenger' aircraft used at all? Were missiles or military aircraft used? Could digital imaging have been used on the television productions to 'stage' an event, an event which was, in actuality, just a 'controlled demolition'?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdjgtBj_HwM&feature=related
Air Flight Discrepancies
So what happened to the passengers and planes and - alleged phone calls:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W-gAg90AQU&feature=related ('alleged' hijackers are alive and well)
Digitalized photos of ''alleged'' victims:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3yTRKhlyqU&feature=related
Simulated Victims - VicSims
Why would the media use 'doctored' images of 'alleged' 9/11 victims?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoZEuj1VPv0&feature=related
Simulated Victims:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfcPwgi99oU&feature=related
Where are the 9/11 victims in the Social Security Death Index?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjlkF9DlImI&feature=related
More 'fishy' flight data?
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html
On next web page, scroll down to read conversations:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/264627/1/
In this link is found the RITA records of BTS statistics of past American air-flights which show no record of AA Flight 11 departing Boston Logan, or AA Flight 77 departing from Washington Dulles on September 11, 2001: You will need to insert the necessary Flight number, departure zone, and departure date and time ...for each of those two flights.
http://www.bts.gov/xml/ontimesummarystatistics/src/dstat/OntimeSummaryDepatures.xml
Flight Data Expert Confirmation: No Evidence Linking FDR Data to American 77
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=20999
Begging more questions.
Why were there discrepancies in the passenger lists, and why were 'reported' passengers found to be 'fictitious'?
Investigators discover passengers and witnesses were fictitious?
http://www.letsroll911.org/
Why would CNN put up a memorial to a fictitious passenger?
http://www.letsroll911.org/2011/09/09/mark-bingham-lets-roll-hero-flight-93fraud-digital-data-exif/
(Passengers were discovered to be fictitious: see 2minutes:20seconds into the video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrsvmM40lio
(More detail on fictitious passengers: using the Social Security Death Index)
http://forums.eog.com/f23/great-blog-on-9-11-lies-207486/
At least 7 of the 'alleged' hijackers are still alive
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html
All these subjects are just begging more questions... All these areas leave us with so few answers.
Both hijacking by CIA assets, and a controlled demolition were used in the 9/11 WTC operation:
CIA Asset Susan Lindauer - 'Plausable Deniability'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxJTwbHdH6k&feature=related
Shanksville site
"No bodies"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It5JC45KMGo&feature=related
Ariel View of "alleged'' crash site:
http://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2010/01/01/9-11-shanksville-flight-93/
Compare the Lockerbie Aircraft bombing site to the Shanksville site:
http://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/08/26/lockerbie-bombing-evidence/
Further Research Links:
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 911 TRUTH WEBSITE
http://www.ae911truth.org/
JOURNAL OF 911 STUDIES WEBSITE
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
AE911Truth - Richard Humenn P.E.E. WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMKReas0WNc
AE911Truth Michael Donly, P.E., Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOL71aZugL4
AE911Truth Kamal Obeid, C.E., S.E. Civil and Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EuFqsyETKQ
AE911Truth Jerry Lobdall, C.E. Chemical Engineer Physicist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0iVvwxjtrA
AE911Truth Casey Pfeiffer, S.E. Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWv_wVKA_7M
AE911Truth Robert Podolski, Physicist, Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP0ykcvOuno
AE911Truth Lynn Margulis, PhD, Scientist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y56Z1zkmAPQ
AE911TRUTH Stephen Dusterwald S.E. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VJy_-eL4C8
AE911Truth Tony Szamboti, M.E. - Mechanical Engineer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uyIS57GpO0
AE911Truth Stephen Barasch High-rise Architect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M44Kyg3HVHI
AE911Truth - Scott Grainger,FPE - Fire Protection Engineer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHHJIg0vVyQ
AE911Truth - Les Young - High-rise Architect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfoVpDPNXRE
AE911Truth Robert McCoy High-rise Architect
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcyFd63Ef_0
AE911Truth Kathy McGrade, B.S. Metallurgical Engineering.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zNHLg3j7sM
AE911Truth Ron Brookman, S E Structural Engineer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2T7yrq5SIw
AE911Truth David Topete, MSCE, S.E..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv1MvCmqimg
WTC Eyewitness " a bomb went off in the lobby first,then a plane hit"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCc9PuQA9b4&feature=watch_response
9/11 WTC Eyewitness heard explosion before WTC2 collapsed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSIT8zKVDmg
9/11 Eyewitness- "Flames exploded out the front of the World Trade Center"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VoFVl9RSpk&feature=related
911 Eyewitness Nina Pineda - "ground shook/booming sound".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b59rAkvjMfY
911 Eyewitness ABC7 Nina Pineda - "Firebombs And Explosions."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9zGcpyoDmg
9/11 Eyewitness Nina Pineda -"From that last explosion it is now again dark"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNym5VZ98KE
9/11 WTC Eyewitness - Philip Morelli
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyeDF37jUI
911 WTC EYEWITNESSES BASEMENT AND LOBBY EXPLOSIONS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAJa8eu-6_g
9/11 Eyewitness to molten metal David Long.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2VWhSVySeg
9/11 WTC Eyewitness Marlene Cruz describes basement explosions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z51vqH6VZL4
9/11 WTC Eyewitness Joe Torres. WABC-NY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv-6eVrPd2w
9/11 : WTC Eyewitness heard "large boom" before the collapse of WTC2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo6WH8o6qmU
9/11 WTC - NYPD Cop "numerous secondary explosions" in WTC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWq0HEBInLE
9/11 WTC CNN:"When The First Tower Collapsed It Was A Massive Explosion"Patty Sabga
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAcxfSExyJk
WTC Eyewitness " a bomb went off in the lobby first,then a plane hit"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCc9PuQA9b4
9/11 : FireFighters describe 3 Explosions After Plane Hit WTC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Tb8gSGQ10
9/11 :WTC Eyewitness describes explosions ( see video description) NIST F.O.I.A.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArNQF-cONhA
