_Below, is an interview with an ex-Navy Seal, who, during the years
1992-2000 was sent on top secret bombing missions in the Middle East,
predominantly in Iraq. Years after the first Gulf War when we were
supposedly not at war with Iraq yet he and Seal Team 9 were targeting
Tomahawk Missiles on a monthly basis taking out targets that were
increasingly "soft"... involving deaths of hundreds of innocent
civilians. Find out how this highly trained young man and his team were
coerced by the military into purposely destroying villages and creating
future terrorists as part of a plan that would ultimately serve their
dark purpose, the war on terror and 911. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkIIBnIuXHM
I do not buy into the White House official conspiracy theory that "Osama Bin Laden and his boys pulled off the WTC 9/11 event".
Here is a compilation of the Who, What, Why and How of the 9/11 World Trade Center demolition project. Let us ask ourselves, "Who had the greatest motive to cover up the 'demolition factor' of the 9/11 event?" and then ask "Why would US Intelligence fabricate the myth of Al Qaeda and Bin Laden, when both were under the auspices of Central Intelligence?" It is all discussed below with explanations. Each of these links offers up a 'piece' to a greater puzzle. It is up to the sincere person to have a 'willing suspension of disbelief' while perusing the material. Some of the pieces to the puzzle come from the most oddest of interviews and individuals, some are highly credible sources....yet, there is buried treasure here.
Who Owns News and Media Networks? Keep in mind that even present day news feed is often 'compromised'. This is why personal investigation oftentimes requires seeking out information in the most unusual places. http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/who-owns-news-and-media-networks.html
Digital Imaging Used in TV Broadcasts of 9/11 Trade Tower Events http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/digital-imaging-used-in-tv-broadcasts-of-911-trade-tower-events.html Please take the time to watch, listen and think about these investigations which expose major TV Broadcasting agencies caught in the act of using digital imaging, graphically overlaid images, and sound dubbing on their televised broadcasts of the 9/11 trade tower controlled demolition. This sinister activity of television fakery, in itself, is enough to reveal 'complicity' on the part of major news agencies and the US Administration.
US Central Intelligence used Osama Bin Laden as a CIA asset to help create the 'Muslim terrorist apparatus' in the early 80's....Later on in the 90's, this US plan was discussed by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book 'The Grand Chessboard", where control of EurAsia was laid out as a necessity for world domination. http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard
Quote: "How America 'manages' Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent. About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources." (p.31)
Comment: We, the Western citizenry, are left with the trillion dollar war expenditures. 100% of our income taxes will go to paying the compiling interest rates of not only multi-trillion dollar warfare costs, but also multi-trillion dollar bank bailouts due to fraudulent banking activity. Where have these wars benefited the general population, let alone the massacred millions of Middle Eastern citizens? This is why exposing banking fraud and unjustified warfare is so important today. Those who pull the strings of Western governments are engaging in destructive and life-damaging activities for their personal profit. They are neither fit to rule, nor justified to take us to war.
I'll admit this short clip is only one viewpoint in the whole affair, however, hundreds of whistle-blowers share the same viewpoint. These are pieces to consider....that is all: Some shocking discoveries: FBI agents say "They didn't kill enough people" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHm4t-rcPa8&feature=related
Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading on 9/11 Flights, Lead Directly into the CIA's Highest Ranks Investigation by Michael C. Ruppert - former Los Angeles Police Department narcotics investigator who discovered CIA trafficking in drugs in 1977. After attempting to expose this, he was forced out of LAPD in 1978 while earning the highest rating reports possible and having no pending disciplinary actions. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/illegaltades.html Quote: "One wonders how much damning evidence is necessary to respond to what is now irrefutable proof that CIA knew about the attacks and did not stop them. Whatever our government is doing, whatever the CIA is doing, it is clearly NOT in the interests of the American people, especially those who died on September 11." Quote: " Her answered floored me. She said, "It probably would have been easy for us to find out who was behind the trades, but the government came in and told the CBOE (Chicago Board Options Exchange) president to stop the investigation." "I said to her again, a third time, making sure I heard right, "The government didn't want you to investigate?" She looked at me said "Yes, that's right." Then she looked at me a little longer, she knew I had interest in this topic, she looked a little nervous and then blurted out to me, "We erased the data. Our data on the trades is gone."
Congressman Ron Paul states that there was no justification for American military intervention in Vietnam, Korea, Iraq or Libya. He states that the hijackers of 9/11 were a group of people not a group of nations. America needed to go after those responsible, not attack entire, non-affiliated, Middle Eastern nations who in no way threatened or provoked war. He implied that 9/11 was used as an excuse to war on the axis-of-oil-bearing nations. Go to the 3:34 mark in the following video interview. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RLonnC_ZWQ0#!
What was the rush to transport the Bin Laden family out of the USA ? Why were these Saudis flown out of the country without being interrogated and questioned as to Bin Laden's whereabouts? http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/fahrenheit-911-facts/what-fahrenheit-911-says-about-the-saudi-flights-out-of-the-country-after-september-11 The question, which has never been answered, is what was the rush in getting these individuals out of the country? As Cloonan says, "If I had to inconvenience a member of the bin Laden family with a subpoena or a Grand Jury, do you think I'd lose any sleep over it? Not for a minute Mike... [Y]ou got a lawyer? Fine. Counselor? Fine. Mr. Bin Laden, this is why I'm asking you, it's not because I think that you're anything. I just want to ask you the questions that I would anybody."
Both hijacking by CIA assets, and a controlled demolition were used in the 9/11 WTC operation: CIA Asset Susan Lindauer - 'Plausable Deniability' I acknowledge that Lindauer was 'muzzled' by the US Administration, after the implementation of the Patriot Act. One has to consider her story in context. For example, would the US Administration want a public figure like Lindauer to expose their crimes so early on in their drive for war on Iraq? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxJTwbHdH6k&feature=related
"Lukoil and many of the other international oil companies that won fields in the auction are now subcontracting mostly with the four largely American oil services companies that are global leaders in their field: Halliburton, Baker Hughes, Weatherford International and Schlumberger. Those four have won the largest portion of the subcontracts to drill for oil, build wells and refurbish old equipment." "While Baker and its American peers are poised to make significant profits from such work in Iraq, wafer-thin margins seem to await Lukoil and the other international oil producers — which include BP of Britain, CNPC of China, ENI of Italy and the Anglo-Dutch company Shell."
The
History of Oil - by Robert Newman Middle Eastern 'oil resources' were one of the key motives for war between Britain and Germany in the early 1900's. This video comedy has an underlying ring of truth to it. Prior to WW I, Britain bombed the German oil transport and railway line to Persia (Iraq). It puts things in perspective for the common layman. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5267640865741878159#
What a Controlled Demolition looks like The next video shows us what to look for in a 'controlled demolition', and then reveals the 'controlled demolition' factor of the 9/11 World Trade Center towers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY
More demolition charges going off: Go to the 4:48 minute mark of this video and then the 6:15 mark http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvyBY8d554I Sometimes we miss what is right in front of our eyes.
Who had access to the tower impact zones? Marvin Bush was the director of the Securacom company which installed an 'alleged' new security system at the World Trade Center prior to 9/11....But what else could they have been installing with 'power-downs' and 'security shut-downs' just prior to the Trade Tower demolition? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZKS73tNVL8 Who had access to tower impact zones? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG3uaQxc8uQ&feature=related
There are more links to this topic, you will need to scroll down this page.
In the next video we see serious fires raged through WTC 5 for hours. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires far more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 5 did not collapse. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41OCQvu7ULQ&feature=related
911 - NIST : A New Standard of Deception - Kevin Ryan. (FULL)
For those who would rather view most of the evidence via documented interviews of firemen, demolition experts, scientists and WTC employees present on that fateful day, plug into this next full length video which brings up some important evidence and questions. It is titled: 9/11 Truth: Hollywood Speaks Out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rw397VbRyM&feature=player_embedded
An analysis of evidence supporting the 9/11 World Trade Center demolition as a False Flag operation
American Military and Intelligence Officers, and government representatives who question 9/11: http://patriotsquestion911.com/ Below are just a handful of the Government/military whistle-blowers: General Wesley Clark, Colonel Ronald D. Ray, Captain Edgar Mitchell DSc, Lt. Colonel Robert Bowman PhD, Colonel George Nelson MBA, Colonel Ann Wright, Col. Donn De Grand-Pre, Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford, Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, Former Deputy Assistant to Secretary of State, Dr. Steve Pieczenik, Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, Commander Ted Muga, Commander Ralph Kolstad, Commander James Clow, MS, Lt. Col. Paul F. Getty, DDS, Former US Marines fighter pilot Joel M. Skousen, Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, Retired fighter pilot Maj. Brian Power-Waters, Maj. Charles E. Dills, PhD, Capt. Russ Wittenberg former US fighter pilot and commercial pilot, Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director
Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS Statement "After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.
Each of the above individuals have offered Americans there own expertise and research, exposing the inconsistencies in the NIST and 9/11 Commission reports. These Military and Government officers do not support the White House conspiracy theory that "a handful of poorly trained pilots pulled off the demolition of three World Trade towers with two airplanes on Sept 11, 2001."
Expert pilots discuss their doubts with regards to any inexperienced air pilots, being able to maneuver passenger airplanes into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon building at speeds over 500 mph: In other words, were those planes actually 'passenger' airliners? What could have actually occurred? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78
Pilots for 9/11 truth: This next presentation uses thorough, air-flight physics in the explanation of how passenger planes just could not have been flown into the trade towers, and especially the Pentagon, by inexperienced, or experienced, pilots. Possibly, refitted, externally guided/controlled aircraft could have, but that begs the question: Where were these aircraft refitted and who controlled them? Or the most simple question of all: Were military aircraft used? Below is an analysis of questionable flight speeds of aircraft. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdjgtBj_HwM&feature=related
I am still laughing at the amazing way that Professor Jim Fetzer counters the assault of FOX news agents and puts forth the argument that 9/11 was a controlled demolition...and how the newscasters kept trying to shut him down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbNszu6zbe4&NR=1 That is how censorship works today. By marginalizing and pigeon-holing those who question the White House Conspiracy Theory that states " the three towers were brought down by two planes manned by inexperienced cessna pilots." So many North Americans simply jump on the bandwagon and make fun of , and name-call, those that have done the investigation and come to realize that 9/11 must have been an inside job.
Witnesses Question What Hit The Towers Some kind of aircraft, a drone, a missile aircraft, maybe even a 767, but not necessarily Flight 11 or Flight 175.
In the next interview with 9/11 firemen, at the 2:33 minute mark, the firefighter states that he saw a 'black, very large airplane fly into the second building'. He didn't see a 'passenger plane'....he saw what was reported by others as a 'military plane'....or by others as a 'plane with no windows'. Besides their testimony of bombs and explosions going off indicating it was a controlled demolition, the report of a 'black' airplane hitting the second tower is important to take notice of. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmC_HKRu428&feature=related
Eye-witness claims he heard the sound of a missile approaching the second tower. Even the chopper 4 televised images don't show us any 'large' aircraft approaching that tower. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq8eiNxKFXI
This is where the movie "Wag The Dog" comes in. The movie reveals how easily fake 'Bin Laden videos' and 'poor images of approaching aircraft' could be digitally inserted into 9/11 WTC Television footage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-FXkj-r9Mc These video clips explain why so many air force pilots have their own doubts as to the ''official White House, and televised, version of 9/11 events". How digital imaging is done: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k-rr70xj2o&feature=related
Explosions in Building Seven--Before Towers Were Demolished A key eyewitness, Barry Jennings, (Emergency Coordinator for the New York Housing Authority) in his original interviews, reported explosions and bodies in the lower floors of the trade centre building 7, well before either of the twin towers had fallen. Regarding Barry Jennings....It wasn't his passing that was important in my opinion (he was not murdered)...but it was that he stated in his earliest interviews that bodies and damage from explosions were in the building seven lower floors prior to the demolition of the taller trade towers. Later on, for reasons unknown, Jennings altered his original testimony. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpqYftxb1oc&feature=related
William Rodriguez, WTC janitor for twenty years, states 'Just prior to the explosion of the first plane hitting the trade tower, there was an explosion in the basement sub-level below him'. So his experience substantiates the many reports of bombs and explosions going off prior to planes hitting and prior to collapse of the towers. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8536008651248732897#docid=4233998022978296776 Rodriguez risked his life in saving many people and was honored for his heroism. And then Rodriguez testified in closed session to the official 9-11 commission (Kean-Zelikow), but his story of what happened that day regarding the explosions in the sub-basements seconds before the plane hit, was suppressed by those whose task it is to cover-up what really happened.
Why would the ''demolition aspect'' of the 9/11 project have been so carefully hidden and ignored by the 'official 9/11 commission report'? Why the cover up? Well, it would have meant the explosive devices and thermate were planted well in advance....and that Silverstein, the lease owner of the towers, knew about it. One can't authorize a building (# seven) to be ''pulled'' unless the demolition devices were already in place.
Even this footage showing a woman waving for help from this trade tower....Thus, we can conclude that the fire is not burning that hot, as is confirmed with the black smoke spewing out. This puts an end to the myth that the towers collapsed due to high heat weakening the steel support beams. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwUpxwAUY1g and here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sawu1L2ok
Building Experts Explain the Controlled Demolition of Building 7 go to the 2 minute 25 second mark in the clip. Even the firemen state in advance "keep your eye on that building, it will be coming down" at the 2 minute 44 second mark of the clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUdhdTXHcn4&NR=1
Temperature of Jet Fueled Office Fires Versus Temperature of Thermate Reaction
First of all: 288°C (550 °F) - open air burning temperature of Jet A-1 fuel 825ºC (1517ºF) - maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air-blue flame) 1535ºC (2795ºF) - melting point of iron 1510ºC (2750ºF) - melting point of typical structural steel
The Thermite reaction produces an extremely hot reaction (up to 2500 °C or 4500 °F), which creates molten iron and aluminum oxide. The molten iron produced from Thermite is white hot and the aluminum oxide is a white smoke. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY
The Government and NIST (National Institute for Standards in Technology) lied to the public: NIST omitted the fact that molten steel and iron, bent steel without cracking, and fused steel and concrete.required heat of over 2750ºF heat. That is far greater heat than any jet-fueled fire can generate. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU&feature=related
What created the numerous large craters at Ground Zero? What is the definition of 'Ground zero'? "Ground zero" is a technical term dating back to the 1940s describing the point on the earth's surface at, above, or below the center of a nuclear detonation." http://911review.com/coverup/groundzero.html
Discover some pretty amazing photos of the melted rock, and the deep, smoothed holes at the demolition site. Thousands of degrees of heat were necessary to create these rock formations below the trade towers, heat not available through jet fuel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_UsC6GvKf0
Could micro-nuclear or some 'intense-explosive' devices have created these large craters at the World Trade Center site? What else could explain these gaping holes in so many building foundations? Watch the images of the smooth rock face, the huge craters, and the photos of the actual tower explosion which are similar to the results of a micro- nuclear explosion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM3bHgTBxGo&feature=related What do nuclear bunker buster or micro-nuclear devices look like when they explode? http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/containment.jpg
19% higher cancer rate among exposed Ground Zero firefighters: If micro-nuclear devices were used then this would explain the high cancer rates among those firefighters exposed to Gound Zero for the first few weeks after 9/11. If the cancers were only linked to dust and toxins from the demolished towers, we would have expected more lung disease and lung cancers. However, this was not the case. New York Times quote: "there were indications that certain cancers including melanoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and thyroid and prostate cancer occurred more frequently among exposed firefighters than in the general population. Occurrences of lung cancer did not increase." http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/health/research/02cancer.html
Why demolition site is cleared before the Building Performance Assessment Team can perform inspection? "FEMA's so-called investigation had the features of a complete farce: http://911review.com/coverup/fema_wtc.html
No independent investigation was funded: FEMA allocated $600,000 for the BPAT's study, which included the cost of printing their report.
Except for an early "tourist trip", The BPAT volunteers were barred from Ground Zero.
They did not see a single piece of steel until almost a month after the disaster.
They had to guess the original locations of the few pieces of steel they saw.
They collected 150 pieces of steel for further study (out of millions of pieces).
Their report, which called for "further investigation and analysis", was published after Ground Zero had been scrubbed.
In May of 2002 FEMA's hand-picked team of volunteers released their report that, although self-described as preliminary and incomplete, would be promoted by government officials as the last word on the causes of the building collapses -- at least until the completion of NIST's Report, more than three years later. FEMA's World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations is full of vague and evasive descriptions of the buildings, deceptive illustrations, and misleading scenarios. Although the report called for more study, by the time it was issued the crime scene had been scrubbed, and the structural steel, which was so essential to any investigation, was long gone. "
Who Had 'Demolition Access' to the Impacted Trade Tower Floors
In an audio interview we discover "Who had 'demolition access' to trade tower floors that were impacted?", and how Paul Bremmer, trade tower occupant/businessman/government adviser, was director of the Japanese company, Komatsu, which patented the 'thermate explosive device" years prior to the 9/11 project. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAkprc7zHW4 more is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG3uaQxc8uQ&feature=related
Marvin Bush was the director of the Securacom company which installed an 'alleged' new security system at the World Trade Center prior to 9/11....But what else could they have been installing with power-downs and security shut-downs just prior to the Trade Tower demolition? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZKS73tNVL8
Who Applied the Thermite Spray? http://www.bollyn.com/game-over-evidence-of-super-thermite-in-the-rubble Provides "info on LVI Services, Inc who apparently developed nano-thermite spray with a 3 million dollar Pentagon contract and then sprayed away per a one million dollar contract starting October 2000 with the WTC, supposedly to treat a problem with asbestos floor tiles, as if that were worth worrying about compared to the ignored 2 billion dollar problem they had with asbestos falling off their structural beams because it was applied without first removing the rust on the beams."
Fingerprint--Discovery of Thermate--Molten Metal Molten Steel found at base of trade tower site....experts discuss this phenomenon...due to thermate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg
Chemist Niels Harrit - One of the scientists who found unreacted thermite in the World Trade Center dust discusses Thermite, Nanothermate, Explosives and Incendiaries. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lU-vu2JvZY
Explosive Material Found in World Trade Center Dust Scientists Discover Both Residues And Un-ignited Fragments Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics In Debris From the Twin Towers "thermite-based pyrotechnics can be engineered to have explosive power similar to conventional high-explosives while providing greater energy density and much greater stability. Thus, aluminothermic cutter charges similar to the shaped charges used in commercial demolitions are entirely feasible. However, a variety of forms of thermite might be used to demolish a steel-framed skyscraper in a way that uses no cutter charges at all..." by Jim Hoffman http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html
If the buildings were ultimately brought down by the use of thermate to cut through the steel beams....why would the 9/11 commission have hidden this from the public? Does not cover‐up indicate complicity? http://www.serendipity.li/wot/571-page‐lie.htm
National Institute of Standards and Technology performs incomplete investigation More cover-up by NIST engineer John Gross. Why? Because over 2795 F heat was created by thermate or some unknown incendiary material to fuse iron, steel and concrete, to melt steel into molten lava, and to bend steel without cracking it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU&feature=related or here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg
More obvious subterfuge by NIST spokesperson S. Shyam Sundar.... NIST signed a contract: "National Institute of Standards and Technology shall not publicly release any information....that might jeopardize public safety" ?? NIST did not search for evidence of thermate. Why not? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk
NIST researchers claim in 'C.6 Suggestions For Future Research', "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear identification for the source of the sulfur has been identified." So why was this 'severe corrosion and erosion' in metal samples not investigated further? http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
Never has the obvious 'controlled demolition' factor been explained in the '9/11 commission's report'. Yet, eye witnesses reported bombs, explosions and detonations in World Trade Centre buildings on 9/11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n‐nT‐luFIw
According to their website, the FDNY ordered 2,000 gallons of Pyrocool FEF during the 9/11 clean-up. Pyrocool mixes with water at 0.4% to extinguish extremely hot fires, like chemical fires or Thermate-induced molten metal fires. 2,000 gallons mixed at 0.4% equals 500,000 gallons of water/pyrocool mixture, of which the majority was sprayed on WTC 7 which was the first building debris to be rapidly hauled away: http://www.pyrocool.org See Press Releases - SUBTERRANEAN FIRES AT GROUND ZERO
Over 1300 architects, engineers, chemical analysts and physicists believe that the world trade centre destruction was due to more than the heat from burning airplane fuel....and involved thermate and demolition explosives. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8182697765360042032# - Architect Richard Gage, AIA
Flight 77 anomalies: http://911review.com/attack/flights/f77.html See Flight 77 and the delayed scrambling, along with the 'slowed' response speed, of air force fighter jets. These planes were capable of flight speeds of 1500 miles per hour, yet timelines show that speeds were kept below 400 miles per hour. Why? Flight 77 transponder was shut down at 8:56 AM , however the plane could still be tracked by radar. Why did it take NORAD 31 minutes before scrambling jet fighters? http://www.fromthewilderness.com/timeline/AAflight77.html
So the question arises, why were air-force fighter jets not scrambled for a full 31 minutes after FAA lost transponder contact with Flight 77? (8:56 A.M.)Ê Flight 77's transponder signal is turned off. 9:24 A.M. The FAA notifies NORAD that Flight 77 "may" have been hijacked. 9:30 A.M. The F-16's scrambled towards Flight 77 get airborne. Why "may have been hijacked", when (Between 8:46 - 8:55 A.M.) Ê a passenger on Flight 77, Barbara Olson, called her husband, Solicitor General Theodore Olson, prior to the plane turning around at 8:55 and tells him hijackers are aboard. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/timeline/AAflight77.html (9:41 A.M.)Ê Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon.
Was the Pentagon hit 'desired'? Why was the Pentagon allowed to be hit by alleged, hijacked aircraft Flight 77? The FAA had lost transponder contact at 8:56 AM , yet we are led to believe that NORAD did not scramble F-16 interceptors for a full 34 minutes ? Yet, according to this interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJAI4-e7Xw Norman Mineta stated that Vice President Dick Cheney was notified three times of the air threat approaching the Pentagon. We are even led to believe 'shoot down' orders were given. Yet, that particular air threat went unhindered and hit the Pentagon at 9:41 AM.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJAI4-e7Xw
Concluding remarks: http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a910tobunker#a910tobunker On the timeline, I have discovered that many reports state that Cheney didn't get into the White House Bunker with Mineta until after 9:55 AM ...which is well after the Flight 77 had hit the Pentagon at 9:41 AM. So, if that is the case, then Cheney could not have been referring to the alleged Flight 77 as it approached the Pentagon, when Mineta heard him say 'of course the orders still stand'.
Instead, those alleged 'shoot down' orders will have applied to the Flight 93 approaching the White House airspace perimeter zone that had been established according to air pilot, code-named, 'Honey'. Which could support the testimony of the mayor of Shanksville that jet fighters were seen in the area. and that missile fire had been heard...as the Flight 93 crashed between 10:03 and 10:06 AM. All this occurring while Cheney was in the White House Bunker giving orders.
Secondly, why was Cheney giving orders?
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a910tobunker#a910tobunker Thirdly, if Cheney was in the White House Bunker with Mineta, as early as 9:26 AM, and the approaching flight 77 air threat was being monitored by radar, then why was that air threat not shot down? If those orders were 'shoot down' orders, then why was that air threat allowed to hit the Pentagon? Notice how I use the word 'air threat'?
Regarding the plane parts that were found, my question is: 'Why was only one engine found? Why was only one rim found?' What of the other heavy rims, second strut and second engine that would have collided with the outer wall? Besides the anomalies stated earlier, definitely some kind of aircraft penetrated the Pentagon that day.
Shanksville 'alleged' crashsite of Flight 93 Was this flight, in actuality, 'shot down' by US air-force fighter jets?
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words... Crashsite Flight 93, Shanksville/ Pennsylvania http://twitpic.com/g4hb4 However, if the aircraft were blown out of the sky, then that would explain the scattered debris found miles away, and why little debris and bodies were found at the crash-site.
There is a hole-- but not much plane debris (bodies, seats or plane parts) in the immediate area , as is found in a usual passenger airplane crash site. So, we are left to understand that the plane must have been blown out of the sky by air-force missile fire, or by a bomb inside the plane. No problem with that. http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/flight93/index.html
US Secretary Mineta statements lead us to believe that Flight 93 was shot down before hitting the White House. However, why wasn't Flight 77 shot down before it hit the Pentagon? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJAI4-e7Xw
Flight 93 and Flight 77 Timelines http://www.fromthewilderness.com/timeline/AAflight93.html (9:55 AM)According to US Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, one particular air threat approached the 50 mile out, then 30 mile out, and final 10 mile protected airspace perimeter position. Vice President Cheney was in the White House bunker with Mineta and was warned of the incoming air threat. Because of that verbal interaction, we can only conclude that the approaching Flight 93 aircraft was shot down later between 10:03 and 10:06 AM, and that the orders from Vice President Dick Cheney must have been shoot down orders. On the other hand, If this verbal interaction allegedly occurred before Flight 77 had hit the Pentagon at 9:41 AM. E', why wasn't that air-threat shot down as it approached the Pentagon? Could those orders have been 'stand down' regarding the Pentagon.(Flight 77)....while 21 minutes later, have been shoot down orders regarding (Flight 93) over Shanksville?
Go to (After 9:44 A.M.) "According to F-16 pilot Honey's account, at some point after the F-16's had set up a defensive perimeter over Washington, the lead pilot received a garbled message about Flight 93 that wasn't heard by the other two pilots. "The message seemed to convey that the White House was an important assent to protect." (9:55 A.M.) This would explain why as Flight 93 was approaching the defensive perimeter surrounding Washington, when the officer came to Cheney and asked ''Do the orders still stand?" according to Mineta, Cheney replied "Well of course they still stand." Those must have been 'shoot down' orders. Because, later on, Flight 93 was shot down near Shanksville at 10:03 to 10:06 AM. On the other hand, If those orders were in regard to Flight 77 as it allegedly approached the Pentagon, then why was that air threat not shot down? In regards to an approaching air threat to the Pentagon, could those orders have been 'stand down'? Go to (Before 10:06 A.M.) Ernie Stuhl, the mayor of Shanksville: "I know of two people -- I will not mention names -- that heard a missile. They both live very close, within a couple of hundred yards... This one fellow's served in Vietnam and he says he's heard them, and he heard one that day." He adds that based on what he has learned, F-16's were "very, very close." [Philadelphia Daily News, 11/15/01]
So the question arises, why were air-force fighter jets not scrambled for a full 31 minutes after FAA lost transponder contact with Flight 77? (8:56 A.M.)Ê Flight 77's transponder signal is turned off. Why wasn't Flight 77 shot down? Why was it allowed to hit the Pentagon at (9:41 AM) E'? Because according to the interview with Norman Mineta, this aircraft threat was being monitored as it approached the Pentagon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRJAI4-e7Xw
Donald Rumsfeld exposed: 'The origin of the 'Stand-Down' orders' http://911review.com/means/standdown.html "CJCSI 3610.01, dated July 31, 1997, required that all requests for assistance in hijackings be approved by the Secretary of Defense. An update to that order, CJCSI 3610.01, dated June 1, 2001, had an exception for emergencies that would seem to give commanders in the field autonomy in ordering intercepts. However, that exception did not cover requests for "potentially lethal assistance", the kind required to respond to the attack:" "(DODD 2025.15, Feb. 18, 1997) 4.4 The Secretary of Defense retains approval authority for support to civil authorities involving: use of Commander in Chief (CINC)-assigned forces (personnel units, and equipment) when required under paragraph 4.5, below; DoD support that will result in a planned event with the potential for confrontation with specifically identified individuals and/or groups or will result in the use of lethal force. 1 "
Why a flying command post is present....and yet no interceptors?
Video footage of: "The 'mystery plane' seen on takeoff on apparently 'live' footage on 9/11. The aircraft is the E-4B Doomsday Plane....a military aircraft...a flying command post. It was seen near WTC 2 just prior to, and during, the impact of "Flight 175" It was seen near the Pentagon. It was seen over the White House." Why was this command post flying about, and yet jet fighter aircraft were allegedly not scrambled on time to intercept the hijacked aircraft? from this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ89yrnCO-4&feature=related and this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMK5bmdAEHc&NR=1
Fabricating The Myth of Bin Laden and Al Qaeda Vice-President Dick Cheney admits in an interview that no evidence links Osama Bin Laden to the 9/11 WTC event: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nX-KQbYXnk
Next in the next compilation of articles, we discover that Bin Laden died in December of 2001, and that his death was reported by veteran CIA officer Robert Baer, Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, former FBI head of countert-errorism Dale Watson, and former Deputy Assistant to the US Secretary of State, Dr. Steve Piecznik: http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/bogus-bin-laden-story-on-canadas-election-day.html
Local Pakistanis say the recent May 2011 Bin Laden story is "drama'', ''untrue", and that photos are of a local elderly man...not some Osama Bin Laden. Local Pakistanis are highly skeptical that Bin Laden was ever in their neighborhood, let alone killed in their neighborhood. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13329078
Alhazmi and Almihdhar: The 9/11 Hijackers Who Should Have Been Caught Most importantly, at what point do incompetence and bureaucratic barriers cease to be reasonable explanations for so many failures surrounding Alhazmi and Almihdhar? Could the US government have been protecting these two for some reason? When will investigators and the media start asking these difficult questions? http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essaykhalidandnawaf
Misled Into War Why question the 'official version of events' surrounding the 9/11 World Trade Centre project? For starters, two ensuing wars based on known 'falsified' evidence (weapons of mass destruction capability was zero, while President Bush quoted false Niger evidence to justify war, then later on admitted Iraq intelligence was wrong) http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/dec/14/usa.iraq1
War Crimes Probe of Bush Administration recommended NEW YORK – Former chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed El Baradei suggests in a new memoir that Bush administration officials should face international criminal investigation for the "shame of a needless war" in Iraq. April 22, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110422/ap_on_re_us/us_elbaradei_memoir
CENSORED 60 Minutes Interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB0uN70dPJs&feature=fvw The interview was buried (censored).....Former 2001 Bush Secretary Treasurer Paul O'Neil tells about the plans to take out Iraq and overtake its oil resources....6 months before 9/11. Even though the ending is more of a campaign add.....The guts of the story is enough to show that our political leaders dance to the tune of power and greed....it is an oligarchy....not a democracy.
Muslim Terrorist Apparatus Was Created By US Intelligence Afghan heroin & the CIA http://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/index.php/afghan-heroin-the-cia/#post I suggest you google "False Flag Terrorism"....and discover how the Muslim terrorist apparatus was created by US intelligence as a geopolitical weapon. American Central Intelligence organized, trained, funded and armed the dis‐united Afghani tribal freedom fighters under one banner, the Taliban, in order to resist Russian infiltration into the Middle Eastern axis‐of‐oil region. http://emperors‐clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm Once the Russian threat was eliminated, the Taliban wished for legitimacy in Afghani national affairs. 'Corporate' American domination was unacceptable to the united Afghan freedom fighters....Prior to 9/11, the US Administration had threatened the Taliban who were reluctant to grant complete control of their homeland to 'corporate' rule. The Taliban were told that submitting to US Administration plans for the region would ''bring a carpet of gold'', but resistance would ''bring a carpet of bombs''. More on the subject is in the following articles. http://www.atimes.com/c‐asia/CK20Ag01.html http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/oil.html
My questions to the reader: "Are you able to think outside of mainstream television productions and discover actual evidence of corruption without labeling it as "conspiracy theory", or do you shut down dialogue before it begins? Does the term "theory" not fall away when "actual" evidence indicates the existence of criminal activity?" Is daring to question the inconsistencies of the 'official 9/11 commission report' really "anti-American"? Wasn't the official White House explanation a ''conspiracy theory'' based on falsehoods and unsubstantiated evidence?
We Were Shown Faked Bin Laden Videos Another question to consider: "Is not the 'Bin Laden‐did‐it‐theory' also a conspiracy theory?" I mean, we were literally force‐fed the White House version of 9/11 events and expected to disregard the lack of motive, the 'controlled demolition' nature of the project, and the lack of evidence linking Bin Laden to the 9/11 event itself. After the entire Bin Laden family was safely escorted/flown out of the US without being questioned or interrogated as to the accused Osama's whereabouts, we were then given faked Bin Laden videos: http://www.prisonplanet.com/former‐cia‐officials‐admit‐to‐faking‐bin‐laden‐video.html ...more faked photos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JwRe5i_VDQ ...and more questionable photos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBIthwLN0iI&feature=related
Osama Bin Laden died in December 2001 Osama Bin Laden was reported by CNN, FOX, the Telegraph, Guardian and the Pentagon to have died in December of 2001. Despite his death, we were shown 'doctored' and 'faked' videos of Bin Laden thereafter. Recently, Americans were fooled again with a completely orchestrated 'second' killing of Bin Laden in May of 2011. Fabrication built upon fabrication....resulting in a completely misinformed American public. http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osama_dead.php
Here is a documented history of how the CIA created Al Qaeda The political and financial connections of the terrorists penetrate to the upper reaches of power, in the British and American governments. http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11timeline60pg
Some call the criminal, global, power-elite who pull the strings of Western governments, 'the Illuminati'. However, don't let that name throw you off. Here are the just some of the connections of Al Qaeda with Central Intelligence. http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/al-quaeda
How Government Manipulates TV Broadcasts I recommend watching a 1997 movie starring Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro titled: "Wag The Dog". It makes the point of 'manipulated media presentations by the US Administration' quite well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-FXkj-r9Mc The next clip of the movie reveals how easily fake 'Bin Laden Videos' could have been put together. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k‐rr70xj2o&feature=related
Israeli/American Covert Intelligence Involvement Next is a quality video which explains why the world trade centre project of 9/11 could very well have been an inside job. Meaning....it was perpetrated by Mossad or CIA black ops as a false flag operation to justify war on the scapegoat nation, in this case, both Afghanistan and Iraq. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4071551301506215141#
When real thought and important critical analysis is thwarted by marginalizing investigation as 'conspiracy theory' then we are in a sorry state of affairs my friend. In other words, it has become vogue to stop all dialogue of the 9/11 project by making fun of those daring to question the ''White House version'' of events. And in my eyes, that is sad indeed. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/571-page‐lie.htm http://www.emeraldinsight.com/books.htm?chapterid=1758119
Was $240 Billion in covert government securities another motive? "On that fateful day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency, and for the first time in U.S. history, invoked its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act Section 12(k) easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next 15 days. These changes would allow an estimated $240 billion in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership." http://www.WantToKnow.info/911/black_eagle_trust_fund
[1] The attacks ... were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas."
"The 9/11 attacks also served to derail multiple Federal investigations of crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. Hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities had to be destroyed. A critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. A situation needed to be created wherein $240 billion dollars of covert securities could be electronically “cleared” without anyone asking questions – which happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its “emergency powers” that very afternoon. [4] "
"There were three major securities brokers in the World Trade Center: Cantor Fitzgerald, Eurobrokers and Garbon Inter Capital. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest securities dealer in the US [7] and arguably the primary target. [8] 41% of the fatalities in the Twin Towers came from Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers. [13] 31% of the 125 fatalities in the Pentagon were from the Naval Command Center that housed the Office of Naval Intelligence. 39 of 40 Office of Naval Intelligence employees died. The Naval Command Center had been moved into that newly opened section of the Pentagon only a month earlier. [21] And in the vaults beneath the World Trade Center Towers, any certificates for bonds were destroyed. [14] "
More Motive by 'Corporate' America--Military Contracts Always check for motive....Check on who will gain the most from terrorist activities and a resulting declared war....Then the pieces to the puzzle of terrorism begin to unravel. For example, every time a war is created the weapons/military/industrial complex (affiliated business, political and military officials) are on the take for billions of dollars in military contracts. Never‐ending war expenditures are welcomed by this group. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArGl1SPYITY Eisenhower speaks about the threat of the expanding US armament industry http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVWEAaP_8ww
More Motive--Maintaining Supremacy in the Drug/Weapons Trade
The oil companies get 80 dollars a barrel....the heroin/opium trade sells a barrel of opium for 19 million dollars. You figure when the US military is preventing the Taliban, Russians and local Afghan tribal lords from the opium fields, and the US military is protecting those poppy fields....then I wonder who is selling the opium?? http://www.truthistreason.net/oil-were-here-for-the-heroin-at-19923200-per-barrel
Control of the opium/heroin trade is another reason for taking out the competition in developing nations. This is a trillion dollar industry. Often, weapons are supplied to poorer, cash‐strapped nations in exchange for drugs like opium or cocaine....and the covert American government agents ship the drugs back to America for resale. In this next video, after the first minute, we learn about <CIA involvement in the weapons/drug trade>...or just Google/Youtube search and discover for yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T‐pA4txvVJ8 more on CIA drugs‐for‐weapons trade: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b6kf5PIzX4&feature=related
-Increase profits to International Bankers who charge compiling interest rates on megabillion dollar warfare debts International bankers often use warfare to set up ''Central Banking systems that are privately controlled" across the globe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrL6IhVKQGw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqJIO88wUNk&feature=related WAR ALLOWS THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS TO: 1. Finance both, or all, sides in war for enormous profits. 2. Profit from the selling of arms through their Military Industrial Complex. 3. Make loans for the rebuilding of countries after the destruction. 4. Get countries under control through debt. 5. Take control of countries by installing puppet regimes, corporate-friendly dictators, or bought-off politicians 6. Take over a country's resources by military intervention, or take control when a country defaults on its war debts. 7. To eliminate (kill) specific citizens who do not wish their country to be under the control of International Banking privateers....in short, to remove any and all resistance to global, private-banking fraud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnrOGO8cVC4 Israeli
air-force jets and navy ships attacked the USS Liberty and the event
was swept under the carpet. The plan was to attack the ship, blame it
on Egypt, and thus entice Americans to join Israel in a war to
take down Egypt...unfortunately for the Israeli/US Administration, the
USS Liberty didn't sink and personnel survived to tell the tale: A more detailed interview with USS Liberty survivors: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NRWBcfXnMo
In Canada, Israeli lobbyists are pushing our politicians to prevent any criticism of Israeli foreign policy: There is a committee discussing making it illegal to criticize Israeli foreign policy....calling it
"antisemitism". http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2767/ That is as ludicrous as calling
criticism of Canadian government policies..."anti‐Canadian".
Is criticism of the illegal Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories really "Anti-Semitic"? A presentation by Norman Finkelstein: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbn8OJ7ju-s
Congressman Ron Paul states that Israel helped establish HAMAS, and during the 80's the US Central Intelligence radicalized the Muslim world and enlisted Osama Bin Laden to resist Russian hegemony. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4UnsNMwg64
Israeli Mossad Activity Caught in the Act on 9/11 -Why was this information buried? Israeli Mossad activity on the day of the world trade center project of Sept. 11th, 2001: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SByT99TMD4&feature=related Why was this covered up and never brought to the public's attention?
Israeli Mossad Agents were caught with a truckload of explosives on
morning of Sept 11th ....while the World Trade Centre is being
demolished. They also had their film gear set up to 'document the
event'.....How did they know in advance there would be an event to
document? http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html
False Flag in Britain To Instigate Fear and Hatred of Muslims A former British agent discusses on video why he believes the London 7/7 bombings were false flag terrorist operations to create a vengeful attitude towards Middle Eastern Muslims....in order to garner support to war on Afghanistan (to build the oil pipeline and take control of opium production) and on Iraq (to overtake the oil reserves). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlzmrFvqgDI A mock Disaster Drill was in progress
at the same time as the real bombings occurred. Just too coincidental is it not?? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk2TtQ3MvCk&feature=related Mossad Chief Confirms Netanyahu’s Warning of London Bombing Why would an alleged Muslim terror group forewarn an arch enemy? Not likely is it? But an insider MI6 British, false flag operation would definitely warn the Israeli Finance Minister. http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2005/07/18/mossad-chief-confirms-netanyahus-warning-of-london-bombing/
US Military Intelligence Caught in the Act of Planning Terror Op A potential 'False flag terrorist op" was stopped by John F. Kennedy when he discovered that US military intelligence was planning to bomb one of their own military bases or a civilian airliner and blame it on the Cubans ....in order to garner support of Americans to war on Cuba. The plan was called "Operation Northwoods" Look it up on your search engine. http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NOR111A.html
Who Is Really Instigating These Terrorist Acts? Consider how mainstream propaganda works. Why would Middle Eastern citizens defending their homeland from foreign aggression be called "insurgents"? Are we really "sure" that all terrorist activities are performed by the 'alleged' group that the American Intelligence agency has pinned the blame on?
Here are examples of Russian FSB covert terrorist activities meant to pin the blame on Chechen separatists and thus garner Russian support for military aggression against Chechnya, and thus ensure no separation could ever occur. http://911blogger.com/node/19691 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNg6zrxxMsM
In Quebec, Canada, the police department finally admitted to creating havoc and disrupting a peaceful demonstration by sending in undercover officers dressed in black as "anarchists" who attempted to foment fighting and discord among the crowd. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCRsj06wT64 More examples of undercover Toronto police instigating and provoking violence at G20 demonstrations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbLU9tdDwxo
My feeling is that labeling those who attempt to reveal corruption as 'conspiracy theorists' is detrimental to necessary investigation and, ultimately, detrimental to creating real peace on this planet.
Understand that our soldiers sacrifice, not for democracy and freedom, but for the pillage and plunder of weaker nations' resources by the likes of Kellogs, Brown and Group, Goldman Sachs, Halliburton, the Carlyle group, British Petroleum, Exxon Mobil, and the military/industrial complex ....all rubber-stamped by the US Legislative Executive and Judicial Branches. Our soldiers, unknowingly, are the 'corporate police force'. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYzJLzTZduk&NR=1
How The Private Banking Industry exploits American taxpayers: Former Assistant Secretary of Housing under George H.W. Bush, Catherine Austin Fitts, blows the whistle on how the financial terrorists have deliberately imploded the US economy and transferred gargantuan amounts of wealth offshore as a means of sacrificing the American middle class.
And more about the creation of birth certificates in the early 1930's to keep the people subjugated and beholding to the private banking industry as 'collateral'. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47jqtTMkZWc
Why do our government representatives allow the private banking industry to have control over our country's monetary system? http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm
The next video documentary reveals 9/11, the Patriot Act, The Project For a New American Century, two wars-for-oil in the Middle East, and the establishment of the 'New World Order' ...all came to fruition under the George Bush Jr. Administration. It is tantamount to present day Fascism (rule of, and for a corporate power-elite, whose drive for wealth and power over-rides the interests of the general population). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5rh6rk5-CU&feature=related
Just to show a skeptic that we’re not the close-minded people he thinks we are, here’s a list of some things we might be wrong about.
We might be wrong to think that people like Dick Cheney and George
Bush should have wanted to investigate anything and everything that led
to the horrible attacks of 9/11, instead of trying to “limit the scope”
of those investigations, and fight against the families who wanted them,
and rightfully so.
We might be wrong to think that our intelligence agencies should have
known something was up because of the suspicious trading that took
place prior to 9/11. Trading that they monitor.
We might be wrong to think that ALL of the suspicious trading should
have been thoroughly investigated by the 9/11 Commission, and that their
conclusion that the trading was “innocuous” is wrong.
We might be wrong to think that the multitude of warnings our
Government received prior to 9/11 should have caused people within the
Bush Administration to warn the American public, and take precautions to
make sure the attacks didn’t succeed.
We might be wrong to think that former Atty Gen. of New York, Eliot
Spitzer, should have responded to the Justice for 9/11 Citizens’
Complaint and Petition delivered to his office in 2004.
We might be wrong to think that a good friend of Dick Cheney’s, Lee
Hamilton, someone known for covering up other things like the October
Surprise, and the Iran/Contra Affair, should not have been made the
co-chairman of the 9/11 Commission.
We might be wrong to think that people like Robert Mueller should
have answered all of the families’ questions when they were asking him
to his face.
We might be wrong to think that someone with so many conflicts of
interest with the Bush Administration, Philip Zelikow, should not have
been put in charge of the 9/11 Commission.
We might be wrong to be concerned about a statement by former 9/11
Commissioner Max Cleland that says, “as each day goes by, we learn that
this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before
Sept. 11 than it has ever admitted.”
We might be wrong to think that the multiple wargames taking place on
the morning of 9/11 caused confusion on the ground, and that ALL of
them should have been thoroughly investigated.
We might be wrong to think that Donald Rumsfeld should have responded
in writing to former Rep. Cynthia McKinney about her question regarding
the wargames taking place that morning.
We might be wrong to think that the most defended airspace in the
world should not have been left completely undefended 34 minutes after
the second tower was hit, when everyone in the world knew America was
under attack.
We might be wrong to think that either Dick Cheney, Richard Myers,
Ralph Eberhart or Donald Rumsfeld somehow impeded the air response that
morning.
We might be wrong to think that members of our Government should not
meet with an alleged financier of the attacks without being brought
forward publicly to testify about those meetings.
We might be wrong to think that elements within our Government and
others collaborate with the Pakistani ISI to initiate terrorist attacks
around the world in order to create a “strategy of tension.”
We might be wrong to think that someone like Shyam Sunder should have
met with people like Dr. Steven Jones to at least look at the
information he has collected.
We might be wrong to think that the Bush Administration should not
have done everything in their power to cover up possible Saudi Arabian
involvement.
We might be wrong to think that Israeli spies in this country prior to 9/11 should have been investigated thoroughly.
We might be wrong to think that someone like Khalil Bin Laden, Osama
Bin Laden’s brother, a person with alleged ties to terrorism, should not
have been allowed to leave the country so soon after 9/11 without
having been thoroughly investigated.
We might be wrong to think that the 28 redacted pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry should be de-classified.
We might be wrong to think that whistleblowers should not be
retaliated against, or gagged because they were trying to do the right
thing.
We might be wrong to think that the Secret Service should have
immediately moved the President out of Emma E. Booker Elementary that
morning in order to protect him, the children, and the school faculty
present.
We might be wrong to think that the President should have immediately
wanted to deal with the occurring crisis instead of continuing with a
photo-op.
We might be wrong to think that 9/11 should not have been used to
take away our civil liberties, and start pre-emptive wars against
countries that had nothing to do with the attacks.
We might be wrong to think that the murder of 2,973 people should be treated as a crime instead of as an “act of war.”
We might be wrong to think that the media in this country should
cover things like family members calling for an entirely new
investigation on two separate occasions.
We might be wrong to think that everyone that was in the PEOC should
have been brought forward to testify publicly and under oath about what
happened that morning.
We might be wrong to think that Dick Cheney and George Bush should have been made to testify publicly and under oath.
We might be wrong to think that there shouldn’t be a single family
member with doubts about how their loved one was murdered, and who was
responsible for it.
We might be wrong to think that the heroes of 9/11 should be given
the health care that they need, and that those who lied about the air
quality should be held accountable.
We might be wrong to think that if people acted either incompetently
or criminally within our Government, then they should be held
accountable, as opposed to being promoted or rewarded.
We might be wrong to think that the event that created the “Post-9/11
World” should be THOROUGHLY investigated to make sure all of the
actions taken in the name of that day are justified, responsible, and in
we, the people’s best interests.
